Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegationmechanism...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Dave Crocker;-)...

Again, your message describes precisely what you did to me personally 
over a several year period of stalking beginning with your work with 
IAHC and continuing into the establishment of ICANN.  I finally 
choked it off by simply never responding directly to anything you say 
or do.  But, here I find that you are right on the money;-)...

I had been seeking a properly correct description of what you were 
doing, and using my theory that one's enemy often attributes to you, 
what he is doing himself, I now have a perfect description of the 
tools and the technique of your trade.

Dave - I cannot thank you enough for explaining how you do it all so well.

I think I will print it up and frame it on my office wall.

And now back into my mode of not responding directly;-)...\s

Cheers;-)...\Stef


At 3:44 PM -0700 8/2/02, Dave Crocker wrote:

[snip]... [snip]... [snip]... [snip]... [snip]... [snip]... [snip]... [snip]...

Evidently you have not had the pleasure of trying to conduct a 
constructive dialogue with someone who has no interest in 
constructive dialogue.

Instead, such folk look only for reasons to attack you.  They distort 
what you say.  They find conspiracy theories to explain your actions, 
independent of the facts.  And so on.

It is nothing like the tautology you suggest.

>Your words only make sense to someone who already believes that ICANN has
>gone to heroic efforts to try to satisfy their criticism.  If you believe
>that ICANN has put almost all of its energy into obfuscation and

Thank you for validating my characterization of the kinds of people 
ICANN must deal with.

d/


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]