Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



randy - hi. i'm a little confused about the exchanges this morning, so bear
with me.


> i have no idea if this is an issue here, as i am not in contact
> with w3c or whomever else.  i expect you, pete, etc. will know far
> better than i if we are nearing hot water here.  i am just asking
> you to please be conscious of the issue.

this is a fair point. there is no w3c effort on instant messaging, while
soap is certainly a w3c effort, i think most folks would be hard-pressed to
find much overlap between it and jabber, other than the fact that they both
use xml at different points in their stack.


> fwiw i have nothing against jabber.  some of my best friends jabber
> :-).  i am even trying to get a secure jabber server working (and
> am hitting problems).  i am just concerned about process and
> precedent.

send me a private note explaining the difficulty, and maybe i can help.

/mtr



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]