Re: RFC3271 and independance of "cyberspace"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> ""
>    Internet is for everyone - but it won't be if legislation around the
>    world creates a thicket of incompatible laws that hinder the growth
>    of electronic commerce, stymie the protection of intellectual
>    property, and stifle freedom of expression and the development of
>    market economies.  Let us dedicate ourselves to the creation of a
>    global legal framework in which laws work across national boundaries
>    to reinforce the upward spiral of value that the Internet is capable
>    of creating.
> ""

I'd like to propose an alternate paragraph here:

""
Internet is for everyone - but it won't be if intellectual property laws
continue to encroach on our freedom to develop and use new technologies,
to share ideas and expressions of ideas with others, to comment on and 
criticize others' ideas and expressions of ideas, to restrict our use 
of ordinary language, and to effectively give a small number of people 
control over the distribution and licensing of popular works.  Let us 
dedicate ourselves to the worldwide abolishment of the provisions in 
intellectual property laws - copyrights, patents, and trademarks - which 
stifle the freedom of expression and the development of a gloabl marketplace 
of ideas, to reinforce the upward spiral of real value (not to be confused 
with money) that the citizens of the world can create with the Internet's 
help.
""

Keith


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]