Re: RFC3271 and independance of "cyberspace"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That would be nice!!!

James

----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Moore" <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: "Alexandre Dulaunoy" <adulau-ietf@conostix.com>
Cc: <ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:16 AM
Subject: Re: RFC3271 and independance of "cyberspace"


> > ""
> >    Internet is for everyone - but it won't be if legislation around the
> >    world creates a thicket of incompatible laws that hinder the growth
> >    of electronic commerce, stymie the protection of intellectual
> >    property, and stifle freedom of expression and the development of
> >    market economies.  Let us dedicate ourselves to the creation of a
> >    global legal framework in which laws work across national boundaries
> >    to reinforce the upward spiral of value that the Internet is capable
> >    of creating.
> > ""
>
> I'd like to propose an alternate paragraph here:
>
> ""
> Internet is for everyone - but it won't be if intellectual property laws
> continue to encroach on our freedom to develop and use new technologies,
> to share ideas and expressions of ideas with others, to comment on and
> criticize others' ideas and expressions of ideas, to restrict our use
> of ordinary language, and to effectively give a small number of people
> control over the distribution and licensing of popular works.  Let us
> dedicate ourselves to the worldwide abolishment of the provisions in
> intellectual property laws - copyrights, patents, and trademarks - which
> stifle the freedom of expression and the development of a gloabl
marketplace
> of ideas, to reinforce the upward spiral of real value (not to be confused
> with money) that the citizens of the world can create with the Internet's
> help.
> ""
>
> Keith
>


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]