> No, the problem with IS-IS is that the spec *IS* 100% open, including > the non-existent parts. that's why so few folk run it. only the vast majority of the largest providers. running code. randy
> No, the problem with IS-IS is that the spec *IS* 100% open, including > the non-existent parts. that's why so few folk run it. only the vast majority of the largest providers. running code. randy