Re: S. 2048, CBDTPA (was: It's war, folks --- SSSCA formally introduced)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:13:18 PST, james woodyatt <jhw@wetware.com>  said:
> 
> > In other words, I think it might help the U.S. Senate to know that they
> > won't have to wait a year for the FCC to make a "negative determination"
> > according to Section 3.(c), i.e. they can go directly to requiring the
> > vendors and users of "digital media devices" in the United States to
> > adopt Internet standards of its own making rather than those of the IETF.
> 
> > Let's see how well Congress likes the taste of *that* medicine...
> 
> Oh, they'll love it.  You'll get a protocol designed by lobbyists for lobbyists.
> 
> Let's not find out.

It exists: remember that protocol suite: ISO OSI?

-- 
William Allen Simpson
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]