Re: S. 2048, CBDTPA (was: It's war, folks --- SSSCA formally introduced)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:13:18 PST, james woodyatt <jhw@wetware.com>  said:

> In other words, I think it might help the U.S. Senate to know that they 
> won't have to wait a year for the FCC to make a "negative determination" 
> according to Section 3.(c), i.e. they can go directly to requiring the 
> vendors and users of "digital media devices" in the United States to 
> adopt Internet standards of its own making rather than those of the IETF.

> Let's see how well Congress likes the taste of *that* medicine...

Oh, they'll love it.  You'll get a protocol designed by lobbyists for lobbyists.

Let's not find out.
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
				Virginia Tech


Attachment: pgp00054.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]