Re: AD review: draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-rtt-option-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Gerrit,

Lars is right, "cannot" is far more idiomatic, in written or spoken text.

http://www.drgrammar.org/frequently-asked-questions#30
http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/cannot.html

Eddie



On 3/4/11 3:54 AM, Gerrit Renker wrote:
Lars, -
|>     than 4 can not be determined: such samples have to be discarded.
|
|   Nit: s/can not/cannot/
|
I would like to ask if we could keep it as it is, the suggestion confuses me:
can is a verb, not the negation, cannot is spoken language, the document is
written text. I actually replace everywhere I see this the other way around,
since I read somewhere that cannot in written text is not considered good
style. If you can give a rule for the above, I am willing to be educated on
the matter.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux DCCP]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [DDR & Rambus]

  Powered by Linux