OK, I still don't get it but this is my last email on it.
You said "the receiver operation is just to remove the UDP header, and treat
the encapsulated DCCP packet as any other native DCCP packet received. I'd
expect this also to be simple to implement as a user-space daemon."
This does not describe the operation of a 6-tuple receiver, since the
described DCCP implementation does not consider UDP ports when looking up
flows. It describes the operation of an IP-plus-DCCP-ports receiver.
Obviously there is some syntactic problem here, in my brain or in the wording.
Eddie
On 02/07/2011 08:29 AM, Colin Perkins wrote:
I'm well aware of the example. It's one of the reasons why I'm arguing for the 6-
