Lars,
On 21 May 2010, at 13:00, Lars Eggert wrote:
On 2010-5-18, at 10:37, Eggert Lars (Nokia-NRC/Espoo) wrote:
(1) do one SCTP-specific and one DCCP-specific UDP encaps
(2) do one generic UDP encaps that can be used with both
(3) do neither (don't do any sort of UDP encaps for SCTP and DCCP)
my current count of folks who stated an opinion stands as follows.
We're not voting - this is to help us determine where the consensus
is.
(1) 3
(2) 3
(3) 2
This doesn't indicate consensus on which flavor if UDP encaps should
be pursued, or if it should be pursued at all in the IETF. With the
turnout this low, my current conclusion would be that we drop the
topic and proposed work items.
Please state an opinion on 1, 2 or 3 if you care about this topic.
If DCCP is to be deployed, we need a standard UDP encapsulation
scheme. Whether that's (1), (2), or some existing tunnelling scheme
matters less than that we've documented "if you want to encapsulate
DCCP in UDP, do it this way" for interoperability.
--
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/
