Re: UDP encaps for SCTP and SCCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 2010-5-18, at 10:37, Eggert Lars (Nokia-NRC/Espoo) wrote:
> (1) do one SCTP-specific and one DCCP-specific UDP encaps
> (2) do one generic UDP encaps that can be used with both
> (3) do neither (don't do any sort of UDP encaps for SCTP and DCCP)

my current count of folks who stated an opinion stands as follows. We're not voting - this is to help us determine where the consensus is.

(1) 3
(2) 3
(3) 2

This doesn't indicate consensus on which flavor if UDP encaps should be pursued, or if it should be pursued at all in the IETF. With the turnout this low, my current conclusion would be that we drop the topic and proposed work items.

Please state an opinion on 1, 2 or 3 if you care about this topic.

Lars

PS: The count comes from emails by Andrew, Tom, Brian, Michael, Lloyd, Bob, Jukka.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux DCCP]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [DDR & Rambus]

  Powered by Linux