Here are some more links that may be of interest:
http://eden-feed.erg.abdn.ac.uk/
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:DCCP_Testing
Gorry
Leandro Sales wrote:
Just to let you know, we have provided DCCP support in the following libs:
- GStreamer Framework
- GNU Common CPP
- GNU uCommon
- GNU CCRTP
In addition to this, we are work on providing support of DCCP in the
Twinkle Softphone.
Thank you,
Leandro.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Pasi Sarolahti <pasi.sarolahti@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
Please see the draft meeting minutes below. Many thanks to Colin for taking
the notes! I have done minor clarifications, mostly to speakers' names. Let
me know if you have corrections to make.
- Pasi
----------------------
DCCP - IETF 76 Hiroshima
Tuesday, November 10, 0900 - 1000
Chair: Pasi Sarolahti
Note taker: Colin Perkins
15 attendees
Status:
Pasi presents slides.
re draft-ietf-dccp-rtp: Magnus notes that the rtcpssm draft has been
updated, and is back with the IESG
re udp encapsulation
- Magnus Westerlund: issue will be discussed in tsvarea on Friday. Magnus is
split on the idea, he sees the benefit, but also the concern
- Colin Perkins: we have an implementation of the nat encapsulation
- Murari Sridharan: lots of people are trying to implement, but the lack of
firewall traversal is stopping people. some udp encap would be good.
- Markku Kojo: don't need a spec, just fill out the iana form
- Magnus: yes, but a spec is importent.
- Colin: why don't we just publish Tom Phelan's draft as experimental? Ask
Tom to resubmit it (or I'll do it...)
next steps
- Colin + Jukka Manner: the group likely doesn't need to meet, but keep it
alive
- Magnus: suggests closing the group, but leaving the list alive
DCCP user guide:
Jukka presents slides
- Pasi: suggests book chapter, articles, etc., as an alternative
- Jukka: needs to be more easily accessible than that
- Yoshifumi Nishida: should do a sales pitch, highlight applications such as
VLC that already support dccp
(unclear that there's interest to move forward with this)
- Magnus: would be good to have a document, even if not necessarily complete
or final. is there the energy to get it done?
- Colin: problem is that the previous one had some controversial sections
(e.g. MUST pad); are we just going to rathole on the same issues, since we
don't have any more expertise
- chair: who has read? couple of hands. who's interested in working on this?
couple of hands
MulTFRC:
- aiming for experimental
- Colin: aim of ccids was to allow experimentation; this seems to fit well.
congestion control algorithms are done in tsvwg/iccrg; once they're happy we
can publish the ccid
- Jukka: does it need to be a wg item?
- Magnus: congestion control algorithms need to be reviewed by iccrg to be
sure they're safe to deploy; given that the algorithm is okay, doesn't see
any real problems publishing another experimetnal ccid
- Magnus: notes that new ccids need IETF consensus to publish
- chair: who has read? no hands
