> Hi, > > On Jun 1, 2009, at 19:14, michawe@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>> Even though we won't be meeting in Stockholm, if you think you can >>> get a >>> draft in time we can explore getting some time for you to present at >>> tsvarea or tsvwg. Pasi, do you agree? Especially since you'll be in >>> Stockholm and I won't :-). >> >> We could definitely have a draft in time - this would be >> a draft of only our mechanism, not a CCID, following the >> approach of the TFRC spec, because this is an easier >> first step in any case. Turning this into a CCID description >> in case people don't want a standalone MulTFRC draft >> shouldn't be a problem. >> >> So, I would greatly appreciate getting some time in >> tsvarea or tsvwg! > > I think it would be fine to discuss this in one of the above groups, > but the chairs of the groups would need to be consulted for a > presentation slot. Okay - I'll ask them and cc you. > Are there plans to have an iccrg session in Stockholm? That wouldn't > be bad place, either, to present MulTFRC for the first time. Or if > none of the above works, I think it would also be possible to arrange > a kind of unofficial Bar-DCCP meeting to discuss this and possible > other new topics, even though we didn't ask to schedule an official > DCCP meeting this time. Yes, we're going to have an ICCRG session, and I'd agree that this would be good if none of the other options work, but I'd really prefer to present this in an IETF transport group. > In any case, I'd also like to encourage preparing a draft by the > Stockholm meeting. Thanks - we'll definitely do that then. Cheers, Michael
