Hi, > Hi Michael, > > Neat! I assume the idea would be to make this an experimental CCID. > Are you considering one draft for both the algorithm and CCID, or one > for the algorithm and one for the CCID as with TFRC? Actually this is one of the questions I wanted to ask the group. The latter (one each) would seem most reasonable to me, though. > At any rate, this effort does seem quite in line with our charter -- > I've always felt that one of the nice things about pluggable CCIDs is > that it creates great room for experimentation. Great! > Even though we won't be meeting in Stockholm, if you think you can get a > draft in time we can explore getting some time for you to present at > tsvarea or tsvwg. Pasi, do you agree? Especially since you'll be in > Stockholm and I won't :-). We could definitely have a draft in time - this would be a draft of only our mechanism, not a CCID, following the approach of the TFRC spec, because this is an easier first step in any case. Turning this into a CCID description in case people don't want a standalone MulTFRC draft shouldn't be a problem. So, I would greatly appreciate getting some time in tsvarea or tsvwg! Cheers, Michael
