Hi Dan, [snipped] > What do you mean by 'separate signaling' -- are you referring to > the SRV record with _dccp-udp? I worry that the DCCP-UDP port > might need to be different than the DCCP-RAW port. Are you > expecting them to always be the same? That should be a > reasonable assumption most of the time, but I worry it might > not work in some case. In the draft right now, DCCP-NAT UDP ports are totally separate from DCCP ports. The UDP port indicates the port that the DCCP service as a whole is running on. The DCCP port that the application is using is carried in the DCCP-NAT generic header (and can/should be the same as the port used for DCCP-RAW). It would be possible to use the UDP ports directly as DCCP ports, but that would mean that you couldn't use them for UDP apps, so that doesn't seem like a good idea. So, for example, SDP for DCCP-NAT would need to carry two ports; one for the UDP port that the DCCP service is running on, and the other for the DCCP port. Tom P.
