RE: Comments on DTLS/DCCP I-D

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Gorry,

[clipped]
> > I don't see any "generic" applications that should be defined (if
RTP
> > wants to use DTLS, then I think whoever wants to do it should define
> > it).
> OK. I guess the first person with a DTLS stack over DCCP should do
this,
> though before they use a SC that's not assigned.

[Tom P.] Well, the first person that writes an application that uses
that DTLS stack, actually -- the SC isn't for DTLS, it's for an app that
uses DTLS.

Tom P.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux DCCP]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [DDR & Rambus]

  Powered by Linux