Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Suresh has posted a revised version of this document based on the last call comments: 


In response to the last call comments, this version makes it clear that the policy being documented is aspirational, which seems to be the rough consensus view of the IETF community. The new text in Section 3 clarifies that the geographic location of a venue should be considered at the same level as Important Criteria specified in draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process. 

Please take a look at the changes.

Thanks,
Alissa


On Apr 5, 2018, at 4:12 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:


The IESG has received a request from the Meeting Venue WG (mtgvenue) to
consider the following document: - 'High level guidance for the meeting
policy of the IETF'
 <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> as Best Current Practice

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2018-04-19. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of
the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


  This document describes a proposed meeting location policy for the
  IETF and the various stakeholders for realizing such a policy.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.






[Index of Archives]     [IETF]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux