Suresh has posted a revised version of this document based on the last call comments: In response to the last call comments, this version makes it clear that the policy being documented is aspirational, which seems to be the rough consensus view of the IETF community. The new text in Section 3 clarifies that the geographic location of a venue should be considered at the same level as Important Criteria specified in draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process. Please take a look at the changes. Thanks, Alissa
|