Re: patch to add readonly support for T60 wireless killswitch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Henning Schild wrote:
> It looks like it is one bit. I did not really read all the docs on ACPI

Yes, from the AML you posted, it is just one bit.  Good, that is hard to get
wrong :-)

You need also to map exactly the semanthics for it, which you already are
doing.  Please tell me if the below is correct:

1. It shows the state of the physical switch.

2. It does not show the state of the hardware radio-kill signal: if the BIOS
   is set to "Radio off", the IPW hardware will still return bit 1 set on
   rf_kill (i.e. hardware radio-kill line active) regardless of the physical
   switch position and GSTS value.

I'd also like to know how it relates to bluetooth.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Advice]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux