On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Shem Multinymous wrote: > >This will cause a lot of cruft in repo.or.cz that I can't easily fix (I > >can't tell the git dumb push protocol to delete a remote branch. Heck, the > >thing is so dumb it can't even figure out it doesn't need to push > >something, > >unlike the pull protocol...). > > Really?! Yikes. > I would just ignore this and wait the feature is (inevitably) added. I have just found that a lot of the issues I had with git are to blame on cogito, including an extreme inneficiency on clone, and after purging cogito and switching to bare git and stgit, I am a much happier camper. Heck, the fact that git clone will clone *all* heads much faster than cogito can clone a single one when using --reference made me very happy indeed :p But I think I used pure git for the push, so the comment on it being a massive waster of bandwidth on initial pushes remains. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
