On Jul 14, William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d. The reason is not because of udev, but other > packages which install their rules in /lib/udev/rules.d need to be fixed > to install them in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d. As the maintainer of udev for a distribution which still supports a standalone /usr I fail to see how this can be an issue. Why should an upstream package install something in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/ if no distribution supports this directory? -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
