On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM, William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:38:24PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >> > TEST_PREFIX UDEVLIBEXECDIR "/rules.d", >> > + TEST_PREFIX "/usr/lib/udev/rules.d", >> > +#ifdef HAVE_SPLIT_USR >> > + TEST_PREFIX "/lib/udev/rules.d", >> > +#endif Now we have 3 instead of one directory here, that really needs to be sorted out. It's not cool to just add every random thing here. :) >> I have no problem with that, even when I think it's the wrong way to >> do these things. It just creates mess, that is much bigger than the >> split-usr ever was. But we have it in systemd, and there is no real >> argument for me to make against it. > > I'm personally not concerned with /usr/local, but the portion above is > the more important to me. For split /usr systems, there is a lot of > software that installs rules in /lib/udev, so I think we need to support > that directory. You are aware that this will not work with the installed binaries in /lib/udev/ referenced from rules and whatever? The code is really not made to have this I-read-stuff-from-all-possible locations. It's a mess you are creating here, by not just merging /lib and /usr/lib right away. > Should I resubmit the patch? Nah, we need to decide what to do first, I'll let you know. Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
