Re: udev regression from 167 to 168 on notion ink adam

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 05, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ah, no counted wrong, missed that there are 5 arguments. The 4th
> argument, the 0x80000 is the SOCK_CLOEXEC. So it looks like your
> kernel does not support accept4. Is that really a 2.6.32 kernel?
Probably it is a libc bug, hppa had the same problem:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617967

Johannes, can you confirm that the newer libc package works so I can add
the appropriate conflicts when it will be in unstable?

Still, udev should just explode if a syscall fails with ENOSYS.

-- 
ciao,
Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux