On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 17:02, Scott James Remnant <scott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 16:30 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 15:20, Scott James Remnant <scott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > This will still be difficult for me to upload with ;) >> > >> > - SUBSYSTEM=="block", KERNEL=="sr[0-9]*", SYMLINK+="scd%n" >> > + SUBSYSTEM=="block", KERNEL=="sr[0-9]*", NAME="scd%n", SYMLINK+="%k" >> > >> > I still think we have this round the right way! :-) >> >> devices.txt is in no way "right" for everything, that section is from >> the 2.4 days, and may not mean anything today. I'll wait for the SCSI >> guys to tell. We should not switch names if there will never be a scd* >> device in the kernel, because that would mean that sr* is the default, >> and scd* is the legacy. I'll come back as soon as I got an answer. >> > No problem, will wait for that :) Got the answers. The block layer and the SCSI maintainer see the kernel name sr* as the default today, and /dev/scd* as a compat link. If anybody cares about devices.txt, this section should just be removed. Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
