On Aug 09, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > - I consider my rules much more readable and elegant than yours > Why not submit patches to get your versions into the upstream version if > they are much better? They are available and up to date in rules/debian/*, nobody ever expressed any interest in this. > > - anyway there are differences in the permissions (e.g. uucp vs. dialout) > Minor things like this should be resolved if possible. These are not minor things, so at best the common rules would need to be patched. > > - the default rules are unusable for Debian since we need to support > > older kernels (currently and until Xen dom0 will be supported by new > > kernels or obsoleted by KVM, >= 2.6.18) > Why would the rules files be dependant on kernel versions? Workarounds, etc. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
