Re: default udev rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 09, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We like to remind everybody, that all distros should work towards a
> default udev rules set, instead of maintaining their own home-grown
Not going to happen, because:
- I consider my rules much more readable and elegant than yours
- anyway there are differences in the permissions (e.g. uucp vs. dialout)
- the default rules are unusable for Debian since we need to support
  older kernels (currently and until Xen dom0 will be supported by new
  kernels or obsoleted by KVM, >= 2.6.18)

> Please consider adapting the default rules now, and let us find a common
> solution for everybody. New packages, like the upcoming DeviceKit-*
> packages will depend on a recent udev with a proper rules setup.
You should formalize what "a proper rules setup" is, not make other
packages depend on the undocumented behaviour of a default configuration.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux