On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 13:24 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > Just to follow up, I've been playing with this patch the past few days > and didn't run into this issue again, so I suspect you're correct that > it was just being misapplied the first two times. Excellent. > Fwiw, I now have a framework set up for automatically building these > patches on the PPC64 machine. Reporting will still be manual for now, > until I'm more confident that all the kinks are worked out and until I > have time to make a report generating script (I've got one for NFSv4 > that I plan to reuse). Sounds good, too. I try to cross-compile every release on a few different .configs, so make sure to relay your .config whenever you have problems and I'll add it to my compile tests. > Anyway, in addition to building and booting these patches, are there any > other tests you'd like to see run on the kernel? Well, once we get the remove code in a little bit better shape, I'd like to get some real stress tests going. But, there's nothing else that comes to mind for now. Thanks for the offer, though. -- Dave
