Dave Hansen wrote: [Mon Mar 07 2005, 01:38:07PM EST] > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 13:34 -0500, Bob Picco wrote: > > Nothing was required for DISCONTIGMEM NUMA. The SPARSEMEM NUMA issue we have > > already addressed in other emails regarding conditional approach or weak > > symbol. One caveat, I really only booted on a single node. I could boot > > on simulated NUMA two node should you like. The simulated NUMA test has been > > done before. > > If you get a chance, that would be nice. Are there any other ia64 NUMA > users around that could do a quick test boot if provided a consolidated > patch? > > -- Dave > I booted a two node pseudo NUMA machine with SPARSEMEM+NUMA configured. Given what Jesse has done, I won't pursue any remote real hardware multi-node testing. Please let me know what more you'd like. bob attempt to get
