On Monday, March 7, 2005 10:50 am, Bob Picco wrote: > Dave Hansen wrote: [Mon Mar 07 2005, 01:38:07PM EST] > > > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 13:34 -0500, Bob Picco wrote: > > > Nothing was required for DISCONTIGMEM NUMA. The SPARSEMEM NUMA issue > > > we have already addressed in other emails regarding conditional > > > approach or weak symbol. One caveat, I really only booted on a single > > > node. I could boot on simulated NUMA two node should you like. The > > > simulated NUMA test has been done before. > > > > If you get a chance, that would be nice. Are there any other ia64 NUMA > > users around that could do a quick test boot if provided a consolidated > > patch? > > > > -- Dave > > Let me see how quickly I can schedule time on a real NUMA machine which is > remotely accessible to me. This might require a day or two. The pseudo > two node NUMA is more under my control (local hardware). Jesse Barnes might > be another option. Sure, I can try something out... what patchset should I download & use? Jesse
