On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 13:34 -0500, Bob Picco wrote: > Nothing was required for DISCONTIGMEM NUMA. The SPARSEMEM NUMA issue we have > already addressed in other emails regarding conditional approach or weak > symbol. One caveat, I really only booted on a single node. I could boot > on simulated NUMA two node should you like. The simulated NUMA test has been > done before. If you get a chance, that would be nice. Are there any other ia64 NUMA users around that could do a quick test boot if provided a consolidated patch? -- Dave
