Re: gtk performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 14:06 +0200, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
about this:

is there any way to create callbacks from the _javascript_ world using the
Webkit2Gtk webview?

I've created a JSON communication channel between GJS and the WebView
through title notifications:

https://gist.github.com/WebReflection/7ab0addec037508cc8380a9c37d285f2#gistcomment-2245132


The nitty-gritty is that you change your title from the page

```js
document.title = `${SECRET}:js=${JSON.stringify(data)}`;
```

and you intercept it from GJS side

```js
webView.connect('notify::title', (self, params) => {
  if (`${SECRET}`:js=/.test(self.title)) {
    const data = "" + 4));
    // do stuff ... then ...
    const response = {};
    self.run_javascript(
      `document.dispatchEvent(
        new CustomEvent(
          '${SECRET}:gjs',
          {detail: ${JSON.stringify(response)}}
        )
      );`,
      null,
      (self, result, error) => {
        self.run_javascript_finish(result);
      }
    );
  }
});
```

This way you can pass any serializable data to the listener and send
eventually data back. The SECRET can be any channel, for circular data just
use one of the many circular JSON parsers/stringifiers (i.e. flatted or
CircularJSON)

Hope this helps at least with the last part of the question.

P.S. on DOM, a table with 1.000.000 rows would be slow as well, the way I'm
scaling these kind of tables on DOM is by rendering only what's visible
(fixed rows height helps a lot with this) virtually updating the scroll bar
which is **not** the native one or performance will be super bad regardless.



On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:44 PM ente <
ente@xxxxxxx
> wrote:

Hi,

I am facing performance issues in GTK upon presenting a big amount of
tabular data. First I used GtkListbox for it's layout flexibility. Handling
more than 10,000 items gets inacceptable slow. Switching to GtkTreeview I
can handle some 300,000 items after applying a few optimizations (column
sizing fixed, fixed height mode): a full load takes about 4 seconds, i.e.
the application feels anything but "responsive" although this is ... ok.
Currently I see 2 options: dropping Gtk in favor of a HTML frontend (that
feels awkward to say) or implementing paging on the GtkTreeview.

At this moment I am analyzing the reasons for the performance issues. I
measured the time it takes to generate a number of labels in a simple loop
(no call ot GtkMain) and to add those labels to a GtkBox:
* 100 labels in 1.7 ms
* 1,000 labels in 20.9 ms
* 10,000 labels in 610 ms
* 100,000 labels in 1m18s
After the loop I pack the GtkBox into a window and show it. That takes
another century to show up.
If I adjust the loop to skip the packing of the labels into the box, the
times are down to:
* 10,000 labels in 115 ms
* 100,000 labels in 940ms

The windows shows up instantly (although empty of course).

So my performance issue is related to the packing. In my tests with the
GtkTreeview it seems speficially to boil down to the sizing and signalling
of the items: The performance of the treeview was highly impacted by the
fixed height mode & the fixed column sizing (more than ordering by a column
or calling GtkMain while adding rows). So my question goes down to: How can
I further optimize my way of using GTK in order to speed up UI? Is there
any way to add 1,000,000 labels to a GtkBox in less than a second? Could I
somehow suspend the signalling during UI creation and replace it by a "I am
done, now calculate all the sizes" signal? Am I wrong about my assumption
that the sizing signalling is the cause for the low performance?

With regards to the treeview: After initially creating the data rows I am
calculating values that affect 4 columns out of 10 columns. So far I
determine the GtkTreeIter of the affected row and update all cells in that
row using gtk_list_store_set. Should I adjust to update the affected
columns only? When I implement paging for the TreeView: should I rather
drop the existing ListStore and create a new or is it faster to overwrite
all elements in the Liststore with the new items?

I tried to use the GtkBuilder in order to setup a box with 100,000 labels.
This performance was somewhat the same as creating the labels in a loop (I
didn't keep the measurements).

I could isolate the problem to UI rendering. If I don't assign my
ListStore to the Treeview, all is fine. As soon as my ListStore is filled,
I assign the model to the treeview. That's the most time consuming step.

Last question: is there any way to create callbacks from the _javascript_
world using the Webkit2Gtk webview? More specificly: I am working in go
language. I am aware of the webview widget. Unfortunately that's a window.
I would prefer to rather place a widget into a native GtkApplicationWindow.
Using Eval I can inject anything into the DOM. How do I get events from the
DOM back to go?


Background on the application:
I am developing a text analysis application. Text fragments get
precalculated attributes assigned. Based on these attributes and the
Levensthein distance between fragments, someone is supposed to (for now:
manually) define text fragment categories (categories). Roughly speaking
the application has a paned window: on the left I show the category list or
an editor for a new / existing category; on the right I show a list of text
fragments with the major 3 attributes or a details view on a specific
fragment: all attributes and a list of similar fragments.

The smallest amount of text fragments to be analyzed and categorized is
about 300,000 items. The number of items goes easily up to 5,000,000 or
even much more. Categorizing all fragments requires about 100 to at maximum
1,000 categories, i.e. there is quite some clustering among those text
fragments. On the interface I work with highlight colors: a human can
easily realize which fragements are already clustered and which aren't.
Usually only a small number of text fragment categories are of special
interest. One could compare it to a log file: I don't care so much about
how often someone sucessfully authorized; it is much more interesting if
someone suddenly fails to authorize.


thanx,


ente
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx

https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list



A brilliant idea!

thanks,

ente
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

[Index of Archives]     [Touch Screen Library]     [GIMP Users]     [Gnome]     [KDE]     [Yosemite News]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux