On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
you made a fairly strong claim: that "too many dynamic (heap) allocations" are involved in slowing down GTK3, either w.r.t. GTK2 and/or w.r.t. other toolkits.
that seems like a fairly easy thing to test.
* Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Sure. But, unfortunately, it's not trivial to set up some useful
> Well, AFAIK, gtk had become much more dynamic than its older
> versions.
> Maybe that's the problem: too many dynamic (heap) allocations,
> lookups, etc, etc.
> hmm, what could we possibly do about it ?
>
> measuring it would be a good first step.
test cases without actually implementing my suggested approach
in several applications first.
you made a fairly strong claim: that "too many dynamic (heap) allocations" are involved in slowing down GTK3, either w.r.t. GTK2 and/or w.r.t. other toolkits.
that seems like a fairly easy thing to test.
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
