On Fri, 25 May 2012 09:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Still, since we are discussing bare-naked gtk+, I am re-asking my > question: in what aspects gtk+ is better than Qt ? Especially, since > we already know it (used to be ? still is ?) slower tan Qt. I simply cannot believe that gtk2 is 2x slower than Qt...It does not make sense to me. Sincerely, Gour -- From anger, complete delusion arises, and from delusion bewilderment of memory. When memory is bewildered, intelligence is lost, and when intelligence is lost one falls down again into the material pool. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
