Re: future of development for the desktop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sergei, what metric are you using to base slowness on?

Kevin,
Please excuse brevity, sent from phone

On May 25, 2012 12:56 PM, "Gour" <gour@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2012 09:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Still, since we are discussing bare-naked gtk+, I am re-asking my
> question: in what aspects gtk+ is better than Qt ? Especially, since
> we already know it (used to be ? still is ?) slower tan Qt.

I simply cannot believe that gtk2 is 2x slower than Qt...It does not
make sense to me.


Sincerely,
Gour

--
>From anger, complete delusion arises, and from delusion
bewilderment of memory. When memory is bewildered,
intelligence is lost, and when intelligence is lost
one falls down again into the material pool.

http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810

_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

[Index of Archives]     [Touch Screen Library]     [GIMP Users]     [Gnome]     [KDE]     [Yosemite News]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux