On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
measuring it would be a good first step.
* Gour <gour@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Well, AFAIK, gtk had become much more dynamic than its older versions.
> Found it...it talks about gtk3 2x slower than gtk2 which I really did
> not notice and cannot say how good that benchmark is to reflect real
> speed.
Maybe that's the problem: too many dynamic (heap) allocations,
lookups, etc, etc.
hmm, what could we possibly do about it ?
measuring it would be a good first step.
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
