----- Original Message ----- > From: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Kevin Anthony <kevin.s.anthony@xxxxxxxxx>; "gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx" <gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 8:12 PM > Subject: Re: future of development for the desktop > > Ah, OK, you're basing the results on GTK+ 3.0. There were a few bugs > in GTK+ 3.0 (that were fixed in subsequent releases), and a lot of > widgets didn't really like the width-for-height allocation model, > tempting the layout to do double the work. A lot of widgets have been > fixed, and Company has also put some time into making GtkTreeView > faster. I'm not sure where he is with that. > Is gtk+ 3.*.* now faster than the latest gtk+-2.*.* ? If not, since even gtk+-2.*.* is slower than Qt, gtk+ loses. ... Here is another thread: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1887070/what-should-i-choose-gtk-or-qt . FWIW, Qt now also is LGPL. I really want to hear from gtk+ "gods" - I've asked the question about gtk+ over Qt advantages, but have never seen an answer. Regards, Sergei. _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
