On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 18:44 +0200, Ingo Krabbe wrote: > > Clutter is the equivalent of CoreAnimation on Quartz; it should be used > > to create dynamic and compelling user interfaces - and it should > > definitely not be used to create GL viewports inside a GTK+ application. > > in fact, if you try to fall back to pure GL it will probably be far less > > performant than it would be normally. > > > > I wonder what it is, that makes clutter so slow. Clutter is *not* slow. > And what are the alternatives, to come back to the initial question. the alternatives for 3D modeling? direct GL is probably a good option - in which case GtkGLExt is a good place to start with. just because it doesn't get many commits it doesn't mean it's dead. ciao, Emmanuele. -- W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
