On 4/4/07, David J. Andruczyk <djandruczyk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nope. that tab is the ONLY one that is updating, and > I have code in place so if that tab is NOT active, it > doesn't even update it at ALL. I have tested this > VERY thoroughly.. By commenting out ONE LINE in my > code that updates the 22 labels on that tab, cpu usage > goes from "high" to zero. Right now it does NOT even > update them all. There is logic in place to reduce > the number of updates. (it checks based on last update > time, the number of times it's skipped, and a "delta" > from last value (if it changes too much it forces and > update) > > I have yet to try placing the label into a GtkFixed > yet as per another users suggestion. > I see. I STAND corrected. MAYBE you should try as (one of the) Paul DAVIES suggested and write a custom label that doesn't propagate the size requests. Shouldn't be too hard. iain _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
