Nope. that tab is the ONLY one that is updating, and I have code in place so if that tab is NOT active, it doesn't even update it at ALL. I have tested this VERY thoroughly.. By commenting out ONE LINE in my code that updates the 22 labels on that tab, cpu usage goes from "high" to zero. Right now it does NOT even update them all. There is logic in place to reduce the number of updates. (it checks based on last update time, the number of times it's skipped, and a "delta" from last value (if it changes too much it forces and update) I have yet to try placing the label into a GtkFixed yet as per another users suggestion. --- Iain * <iaingnome@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 4/3/07, David J. Andruczyk > <djandruczyk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > http://megatunix.sourceforge.net/screenshots/images/runtime-display-tab.png > > Just wondering, and not in anyway trying to dispute > that GtkLabel > could be better, but are there lots of labels on all > those hidden > pages also being updated 30times a second? If there > are, then I'm not > really surprised that there's severe performance > issues. You probably > want to listen for the page change signal and turn > off updating for > the pages that aren't visible. I bet once you do > that, you'll have no > performance issues whatsoever. > > iain > -- David J. Andruczyk ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
