Hi, Does anyone have a quick answer for this question? Thanks --- John Koshi <jkoshi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:44:02 -0700 (PDT) > From: John Koshi <jkoshi@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Question on gtk library dependencies > To: gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx > > > Hello, > > Sorry about the long-winded explanation below, but it > gives a clear picture about a concern I have. > > I was building a simple gtk application for ipaq h6300 > under Familiar 0.8.4 , and had to do the following: > > 1) Install gtk+-dev_2.6.7-r1_arm.ipk > 2) Install libglib-2.0-dev_2.6.4-r0_arm.ipk > 3) Install pango-dev_1.8.1-r2_arm.ipk > 4) Install libatk-1.0-dev_1.9.0-r0_arm.ipk > > I had to fix some of the sym links, provide the linker > with the library path, and then the build worked and > tested OK. > > I later tried to install the "Roadmap" application, from > http://sourceforge.net/projects/roadmap/ (the package is > roadmap_1.0.12_arm.ipk). For it's dependencies, I had to > install gpsd_2.20-r2_arm.ipk, and libgps10_2.20-r2_arm.ipk. > > The remaining dependency for Roadmap to install correctly > is libgtk2.0-0. > > Looking at the libraries, I see libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.600.10 > is already present. Will there be a conflict if I now get > the package libgtk2.0-0 from Familiar? > > My concern is that libgtk2.0-0 and it's several dependencies > (ie:libgcc1, libglib2.0-0, liblango1.0-0, libatk0, etc), all > appear to be earlier versions than what I now have installed > on my ipaq, and I may end with a mess if I do install it. > > Thanks in advance for your help. > > regards, > John > > _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
