Yes, I agree, but gst-plugin-base and gst-plugin-good can be considered as "safety" in practice? 2010/4/25 Stefan Kost <ensonic at hora-obscura.de> > Am 22.04.2010 04:31, schrieb LIANG ZHAO: > > Thanks Stefan. > > > > I am not familiar with OSS license, but I know the LGPL has > > "Redistribute" feature. That means if some commercial products have > > integrated it, we can use it freely and safety according "Redistribute". > > > > By my search on google, I find maemo5 and Fedora have integrated > > gst-plugin-bad, so by my understanding, it should be ok for me too on > > gst-plugin-bad. > > > > From gstreamer website, it describes gst-plugin-bad not like > > gst-plugin-ugly. > > > > "GStreamer Ugly Plug-ins is a set of plug-ins that have good quality and > > correct functionality, but distributing them might pose problems. The > > license on either the plug-ins or the supporting libraries might not be > > how we'd like. The code might be widely known to present patent problems. > " > > > > " GStreamer Bad Plug-ins is a set of plug-ins that aren't up to par > > compared to the rest. They might be close to being good quality, but > > they're missing something - be it a good code review, some > > documentation, a set of tests, a real live maintainer, or some actual > > wide use. " > > > > Seems gst-plugin-bad has no license issues but not good quality than > > gst-plugin-ugly. > > gst-plugin-bad can have both license and/or quality issues. Anyway if you > want > to use those plugins in a commerical product review the code with IPR/Legal > persons - it is not only the license that matters. > > Stefan > > > > > > > > 2010/4/21 Stefan Kost <ensonic at hora-obscura.de > > <mailto:ensonic at hora-obscura.de>> > > > > Liang Zhao wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Could someone help me on aacparse and amrparse license in > > > gst-plugin-bad? I want to integrate these 2 elements into our > product, > > > but I don't know whether the LGPL is the license issue? > > > > You find the lices stated in the plugin and also at thye top of the > > source files. It is up to you to decide wheter LGPL is fine for you > > or not. > > > > > > I find in maemo5 SDK ARMEL binary, they are integrated into it, and > > > marked as LGPL, does that mean I can use it freely and safely on > law? > > > I also find no mp3parse and asfdemux in it, does that mean it is > have > > > issues on the LGPL license? or I need to re-implement it with > > > proprietary license. > > mp3parse should be fine as LGPLK and should be moved out > > gst-plugins-ugly. for asf you find licese details on microsoft > webpages. > > > > Stefan > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -- > > > BRs. > > > Zhao Liang > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Gstreamer-embedded mailing list > > > Gstreamer-embedded at lists.sourceforge.net > > <mailto:Gstreamer-embedded at lists.sourceforge.net> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-embedded > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > Gstreamer-embedded mailing list > > Gstreamer-embedded at lists.sourceforge.net > > <mailto:Gstreamer-embedded at lists.sourceforge.net> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-embedded > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Zhao Liang > > > > No.1 Wang Jing East Road Chao Yang District > > Beijing, 100102 China > > +86-10-84733698 > > -- Zhao Liang No.1 Wang Jing East Road Chao Yang District Beijing, 100102 China +86-10-84733698 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/gstreamer-embedded/attachments/20100426/03f38902/attachment.htm>
