Am 22.04.2010 04:31, schrieb LIANG ZHAO: > Thanks Stefan. > > I am not familiar with OSS license, but I know the LGPL has > "Redistribute" feature. That means if some commercial products have > integrated it, we can use it freely and safety according "Redistribute". > > By my search on google, I find maemo5 and Fedora have integrated > gst-plugin-bad, so by my understanding, it should be ok for me too on > gst-plugin-bad. > > From gstreamer website, it describes gst-plugin-bad not like > gst-plugin-ugly. > > "GStreamer Ugly Plug-ins is a set of plug-ins that have good quality and > correct functionality, but distributing them might pose problems. The > license on either the plug-ins or the supporting libraries might not be > how we'd like. The code might be widely known to present patent problems. " > > " GStreamer Bad Plug-ins is a set of plug-ins that aren't up to par > compared to the rest. They might be close to being good quality, but > they're missing something - be it a good code review, some > documentation, a set of tests, a real live maintainer, or some actual > wide use. " > > Seems gst-plugin-bad has no license issues but not good quality than > gst-plugin-ugly. gst-plugin-bad can have both license and/or quality issues. Anyway if you want to use those plugins in a commerical product review the code with IPR/Legal persons - it is not only the license that matters. Stefan > > > 2010/4/21 Stefan Kost <ensonic at hora-obscura.de > <mailto:ensonic at hora-obscura.de>> > > Liang Zhao wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could someone help me on aacparse and amrparse license in > > gst-plugin-bad? I want to integrate these 2 elements into our product, > > but I don't know whether the LGPL is the license issue? > > You find the lices stated in the plugin and also at thye top of the > source files. It is up to you to decide wheter LGPL is fine for you > or not. > > > > I find in maemo5 SDK ARMEL binary, they are integrated into it, and > > marked as LGPL, does that mean I can use it freely and safely on law? > > I also find no mp3parse and asfdemux in it, does that mean it is have > > issues on the LGPL license? or I need to re-implement it with > > proprietary license. > mp3parse should be fine as LGPLK and should be moved out > gst-plugins-ugly. for asf you find licese details on microsoft webpages. > > Stefan > > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > BRs. > > Zhao Liang > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gstreamer-embedded mailing list > > Gstreamer-embedded at lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:Gstreamer-embedded at lists.sourceforge.net> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-embedded > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Gstreamer-embedded mailing list > Gstreamer-embedded at lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:Gstreamer-embedded at lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-embedded > > > > > -- > Zhao Liang > > No.1 Wang Jing East Road Chao Yang District > Beijing, 100102 China > +86-10-84733698
