Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Provide and use generic_handle_irq_safe() where appropriate.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 2022-02-15 15:16:36 [+0000], Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2022-02-15 14:36:01 [+0000], Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Do we really need to coordinate this series cross-subsystem?
> > 
> > I would suggest to merge it via irq subsystem but I leave the logistics
> > to tglx.
> Could you answer by other questions too please?

I don't think that I can answer them. I said I leave the logistics to

This can go via one merge via irq. This can also go differently i.e.
feature branch on top of 5.17-rc1 (with 1/7) which is merge into each
subsystem and then the "feature" on top.

Either way it remains bisect-able since each driver is changed
individually. There is no need to merge them in one go but since it is
that small it probably makes sense. But I don't do the logistics here.

greybus-dev mailing list -- greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to greybus-dev-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk App Development]     [PJ SIP]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [IETF Sipping]     [Info Cyrus]     [ALSA User]     [Fedora Linux Users]     [Linux SCTP]     [DCCP]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Asterisk Books]

  Powered by Linux