On Fri, 11 Feb 2022, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > handler/ interrupt controller entry). It is low level code and the > function expects that interrupts are disabled at entry point. > > This isn't the case for invocations from tasklets, workqueues or the > primary interrupt handler on PREEMPT_RT. Once this gets noticed a > "local_irq_disable|safe()" is added. To avoid further confusion this > series adds generic_handle_irq_safe() which can be used from any context > and adds a few user. > > v2…v4: > - Correct kernel doc for generic_handle_irq_safe() as per Wolfram Sang. > - Use "misc" instead of "mfd" for the hi6421-spmi-pmic driver. > > v2…v1: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220131123404.175438-1-bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > - Redo kernel-doc for generic_handle_irq_safe() in #1. > - Use generic_handle_irq_safe() instead of generic_handle_irq() in the > patch description where I accidently used the wrong one. > v1: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220127113303.3012207-1-bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Please use the official cover-letter format (--cover-letter). It would have been nice to at least find a diff stat here. ... Do we really need to coordinate this series cross-subsystem? Can we first apply the API, then have each of the subsystems adapted separately? Does the change-over all need to happen concurrently? If the latter is the case, is this set bisectable? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog _______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list -- greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to greybus-dev-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|