Hi Alex, On Saturday 10 Dec 2016 18:40:27 Alex Elder wrote: > On 12/01/2016 04:35 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: (Adding back a bit more context) > >> IoT technically means (my understanding) a way of accessing edge devices > >> over the internet or allowing edge devices access to the Internet. > > > > Greybus seems of little value in that context, given that it can't be > > transported over the internet (now if we want to change that I'm open for > > discussions, but it will be a very different concept). > > Can you clarify what you mean by this? Right now, certainly not. > But one could envision Greybus protocols going over TCP/IP or > something. > > Anyway, I'm not saying it's a good idea, but I didn't understand > your statement. If we can't transport Greybus over the internet (and thus over IP) then the above definition of IoT doesn't really apply to Greybus. Greybus can certainly help implementing the use case by handling the last hop between sensors and gateways, but we then need to define our position when compared to existing field bus protocols. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/greybus-dev
|