On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:29:43PM +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 05/12/16 15:20, Jim Wylder wrote: > > Unipro is quite capable of using i2c as a control path, but the ARM > > processor on the TSB doesn't have enough power gates. We have to > > completely power off the TSB to meet current drain targets for idle > > state. > > > > We do not currently have a gbsim. > > > > Jim > > I guess another approach to take is to start to cherry-pick the Moto Z > patches and > > 1. Ensure they don't break what we have upstream > 2. Try to add parallel support to gbsim to validate them > 3. The spec would definitely need some hand-holding (alot of) hand > holding > > If we try to take the Moto Z sources in - the Greybus spec should > reflect the integrated set ... after all a formal spec is a good thing. I agree. I want to bump the spec version number soon to make it a "released" spec, but I worry about this merge. Should I just cut what we have today in the spec as a 1.0, and then we work to make the merge "2.0" to allow everyone to work together better? Oh, and for those that might have missed it, we now have a proper license for the spec and implementing the spec, so everyone should be happy: https://github.com/projectara/greybus-spec/commit/7c76600bcbc372e35d1f654c121745aa332c7b09 thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/greybus-dev
|