Re: What is going on with GPM sources/copyright?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> But you are certainly loose in cases when some parts of the code 
> can be inlined and/or eliminated - compiler can't make this 
> decision when you split everything apart and everything is extern.

Okay, inlining an local calls is a valid argument. Feel free to
analyze it a bit deeper and maybe provide patches :)

> > Why not just having it all in one AUTHORS file ?
> >
> 
> A person may have copyright interest in just a part of the project,
> not the whole thing. 

Did this ever happen in this project ?


cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
 	http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
	http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gpm mailing list
gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/gpm

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]