* Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is it some uber cool programming technique that requires splitting > _every_ function into a separate source file? Maintenability ? Lesser change of conflicts on merge / rebase ? Faster incremental rebuilds ? > More importantly, why copyright notices of all former contributors have been > stripped off once the code was moved? It is one thing to add your own > copyright string (although even that requires the change to be copyrightable > and not a mechanical transformation) but claiming sole copyright over > entire body of code it something quite different. Why not just having it all in one AUTHORS file ? If someone's interested in an in-depth analysis - `git log` might help ... cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ gpm mailing list gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/gpm