Hello,
I've been testing with different routing modes and while all of them work I'm wondering if there are any performance considerations to keep in mind.
(note: gnugk is behind a firewall that is handling the NAT, forwarding and opening dynamic ports as needed)
Naturally full proxy mode shows more CPU usage on the gnugk server and ensures there is a single internal source as far as the firewall is concerned. Though I don't see any notable quality or call performance differences between the three. (dropped packets, clarity, etc..)
For now I've dropped back to H245Routed for external calls and Routed for LAN/WAN calls.
For example are there any recommendations based on connection speed? ie: a 20mb point-to-point fiber using one mode vs a single T1? Until we can upgrade the T1 site I'm trying to improve the consistency of video service.
Thank You,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
