Hi, to GnuGk it shouldn't make a difference with signal port you use (and in current releases 1720 is the default). Maybe you have a firewall in the path that thinks it knows H.323 and treats traffic on port 1720 differently and breaks H.460.18 ? Cisco ASA ? I would check the GnuGk trace if a.) GnuGk accepts the H.4601.8 feature in the endpoint registration and b.) if it tries to send out an SCI when the endpoint is called. Regards, Jan -- Jan Willamowius, Founder of the GNU Gatekeeper Project EMail : jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Website: http://www.gnugk.org Support: http://www.willamowius.com/gnugk-support.html Relaxed Communications GmbH Frahmredder 91 22393 Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Jan Willamowius HRB 125261 (Amtsgericht Hamburg) USt-IdNr: DE286003584 Bo Xu wrote: > Hi, > > I just change CallSignalPort back to 1721(1721 is its default value, but > normally we set it as 1720 so when terminal dial GnuGK we don't need to > specify the prot 1721), now terminal-B can call terminal-A(NATed) fine as > the following: > I saw after terminal-A(NATed) sent facility message to GnuGk's port-1721, > GnuGK sent back setup message > > could you tell me why there is no setup message sent back from GnuGK if I > set CallSignalPort as 1720 in the gatekeeper.ini? if I still want to use > 1720 as CallSignalPort how to do that Thanks! > > Regards, > Bo > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Bo Xu <boxuscience@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a GnuGK with H.460.18 enabled, and terminal-A and terminal-B all > > register to that GnuGK, and terminal-A is behind NAT. > > > > when terminal-A(NATed) calls terminal-B everything works fine, but when > > terminal-B calls terminal-A(NATed), from the wireshark in terminal-A, I saw: > > GnuGK sent SCI to terminal-A(NATed)'s 1719-port > > terminal-A(NATed) sent SCR to GnuGK's 1719-port > > then terminal-A(NATed) sent facility to GnuGK's 1720-port(I set GnuGK use > > 1720 as CallSignalPort) > > > > but after that, GnuGK didn't sent Setup messge back to terminal-A(NATed) > > as mentioned here: > > http://www.gnugk.org/nat-traversal.html > > > > I guess the facility massage terminal-A(NATed) sent to GnuGK might not be > > correct so GnuGK refuse to sent Setup back, could you give me a sample of > > the correct facility messge? is there other issue in what I did in the > > above? it is right for terminal-A(NATed) sent facility-message to GnuGK's > > 1720-port? Thanks! > > > > Regards, > > Bo Xu ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
