I have problems interpreting several statements form the manual. I have network topology involving 3 firewalls and a DMZ and need to eliminate as many variables as possible to get GNUGK to work
for all possible location of endpoints. Having hard time...
Note to make proxy work, the gatekeeper must have direct connection to both networks of the caller and callee.
What precisely is "direct connection"?
SupportCallingNATedEndpoints=0Default:
1Whether to allow an endpoint behind an NAT box that support GnuGk NAT Traversal technique to receive calls. Use this to block errant gateways that do not support GnuGk Nat Traversal technique properly from causing one way audio problems when trying to call to the gateway.
I always assumed that "Tanderbesque" firewall/NAT traversal is local to traversal server and traversal client, i.e. it is transparent to external EPs and gateways. How can a gateway "not support" NAT traversal technique?
SupportNATedEndpoints=1Default:
0Whether to allow an endpoint behind a NAT box register to the gatekeeper. If yes, the gatekeeper will translate the IP address in Q.931 and H.245 channel into the IP of NAT box
Hmm... Isn't it translating non-routable addresses the ONLY sensible solution? This is essentially an H323 ALG on gatekeeper side. Could I get an example of a network topology in which NOT doing this translation helps connecting the call?
Cisco VCS Control uses the "non-translation" technique to block NATed EPs from using Control, thereby forcing users to buy VCS Expressway. Why would GNUGK use such call routing method as a default?
Marek Podgorny
Marek Podgorny
CollabWorx
CollabWorx
marek.podgorny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (eMail, SIP, Jabber, GTalk, video)
+1 315 373-6345
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Georgiewskiy Yuriy <bottleman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2013-11-01 12:36 +0100, Jan Willamowius wrote openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxx...:
JW>Hi,
JW>
JW>I have fixed a resource leak in the ssh status port implementation.
JW>Please try the CVS.
JW>
JW>I still see a leak of about 1K per connection, but I believe thats
JW>a bug inside libssh. It will take a while for that to add up, but if
JW>you have the option, use a persistent connection to monitor GnuGk over
JW>SSH.
Thanks, i will try it soon.
C уважением With Best Regards
Георгиевский Юрий. Georgiewskiy Yuriy
+7 4872 711666 +7 4872 711666
факс +7 4872 711143 fax +7 4872 711143
Компания ООО "Ай Ти Сервис" IT Service Ltd
http://nkoort.ru http://nkoort.ru
JID: GHhost@xxxxxxxxxx JID: GHhost@xxxxxxxxxx
YG129-RIPE YG129-RIPE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
